Legal Opinion

Flores v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 10, 1994No. 01-93-01096-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUTSON-DUNN, Justice.

Appellant, Alex Flores, was indicted for auto theft and unauthorized use of a vehicle. After appellant waived his right to a jury trial and pleaded not guilty, the trial court found him guilty of auto theft. The court found an enhancement paragraph to be true and assessed punishment at four-years imprisonment.

In a sole point of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient for the court to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted with the intent to deprive the complainant of the automobile. We agree. We sustain appellant’s point of error and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Farrakhan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Splawn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  4. Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bailey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API