Burton v. Cyanamid
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
Applying risk contribution theory to Thomas' strict products liability claim, Thomas will have to prove the following elements to the satisfaction of the trier of fact:(1) That the white lead carbonate was defective when it left the possession or control of the pigment manufacturers;(2) That it was unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer;(3) That the defect was a cause of [the plaintiff's] injuries or damages;(4) That the pigment manufacturer engaged in the business of producing or marketing white lead carbonate or, put negatively, that this is not an isolated or infrequent transaction…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- James Blasius v. Angel Automotive Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. MallettWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Schuh v. Fox River Tractor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Latonya Cannon v. Armstrong Containers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Allen v. American Cyanamid CoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Anthony Thompson v. Armstrong Containers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Burton v. American Cyanamid CoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Burton v. American Cyanamid CoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.