Legal Opinion

In Re the Claim Against the Grain Buyer's Bond of Mischel Grain & Seed, Warren, MN, Bond 92770608627589

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 1999No. C9-98-1814Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge. *

Relator challenges the Commissioner of Agriculture’s decision approving and adopting the ALJ’s recommendation and ordering relator to pay the maximum liability amount of a grain-buyer’s bond. Because we conclude that the commissioner erred as a matter of law in deciding that all of the grain seller’s claims were timely filed and covered by the bond, we reverse.

FACTS

Misehel Grain and Seed Company (Mis-chel) was a licensed grain buyer through June 30, 1996, and carried a $30,000 grain-buyer’s bond issued by relator Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Auto-Owners). Although…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. In Re the Claims Against the Grain Buyer's Bond No. 877706-08624237Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API