Legal Opinion

Matter of Rogers

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 6, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The District IX Ethics Committee (DEC) filed a presentment against respondent, Lee Jasper Rogers, following an audit and investigation that began after respondent’s bank notified the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) of an overdraft on respondent’s trust account. The DEC found that respondent had knowingly misappropriated funds in two separate real estate matters, one involving the purchase of property by the Hulls, respondent’s clients, from the Homers (count one), and the second involving the collection of rent for respondent’s client Walter Perry (count two). The DEC also determined that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of PerezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of ChidiacSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. In Re FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. Matter of Feng LiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. In re DilietoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. In re GifisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API