Stepovich v. State

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Nicholas Stepovich appeals his convictions for fourth-degree controlled substance misconduct (possession of cocaine) and attempted evidence tampering.1 He contends that the evidence against him was the unlawful fruit of an investigative stop that was not supported by reasonable suspicion of identifiable criminal activity. Stepovich also argues that his trial was flawed by two mistaken evidentiary rulings. Finally, Stepovich argues that the evidence presented at his trial is insufficient to support his conviction for attempted evidence tampering.

For the reasons…