Legal Opinion
Brett Wagers v. Robinson Nevada Mining Company, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 3, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00055Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 BRETT WAGERS, 3:25-cv-00055-MMD-CLB 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 ROBINSON NEVADA 9 MINING COMPANY, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 I. SUMMARY 12 Pro se Plaintiff Brett Wagers sued Defendants Robinson Nevada Mining Company 13 (“Robinson”), Mark Beres II, and John Haynes for events arising out of his employment 14 with Robinson. (ECF No. 35 (Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)).) Before the Court is 15 Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 36 (“Motion”).)1 For the reasons explained 16 below, the Court will grant the Motion in part and deny it…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.