Legal Opinion

Sachs v. High Clothing Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 22, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On bill, &C.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

The application is to compel'the receiver to account for certain mone3s which he had paid out under the orders of this court. The charge of the applicant is that an arrangement was made that certain claims, among them, the claim of one Lichtman for $1,000, should be held until established at law or by this court. I have no difficulty whatever in dealing with the application and in denying it upon the record. An order was originally made upon the application of Staw, the present applicant, under the sixty-ninth section of the Corporation act directing the receiver to make certain…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re CarubaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. State v. GussmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Backer v. A.B. B. Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. In Re JibbNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API