National Labor Relations Board v. Pneu Electric, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge:
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”), in seeking enforcement of its order against Respondents Pneu-Electric, Inc. (“Pneu-Elect”) and Nan Ya Plastics Corp. (“Nan Ya”), raises three issues before us. First, whether substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that Pneu-Elect and Nan Ya violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 151, et seq., by numerous coercive anti- union acts and statements, including interrogation, threats, and imposition of invalid no-solicitation rules. Second, whether…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- New York New York, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Renew Home Health v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Tesla v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Tesla v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.