Legal Opinion
Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 7, 1996No. Civil Action 96-94, 96-107-JJFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court is the Application for a Temporary Restraining Order filed by Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. (“TRO”) (D.I. 3). 1 Pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Playboy seeks to prevent Defendants the United States, the United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Janet Reno, and the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) 2 from implementing or enforcing Section 505 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “Act”) 3 pending a preliminary injunction hearing before a three-judge court. 4 Playboy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hohe v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Opticians Association Of America v. Independent Opticians Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Clean Ocean Action v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brown v. Dolgencorp LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020