Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilson v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1962No. Civ. 19800Published

1DissentSalsman, J.

I dissent.

The plaintiff’s complaint is sufficient to pass the test of a general demurrer. We must here assume that all of the pleaded facts are true. (Jensen v. City of Modesto, 89 Cal.App.2d 835 [202 P.2d 332]; Abroms v. New York Life Ins. Co., 53 Cal.App.2d 764 [128 P.2d 391].) The complaint shows the creation of the trust; it alleges that the trustor intended only the natural born children of the life beneficiary to receive the trust *548property on distribution, to the exclusion of all other persons; that plaintiff is the only natural child of Olga Wilson, the life beneficiary; that in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API