Legal Opinion

Miller v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 1, 1933No. 7 Div. 224PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals clearly discloses that, even if error be conceded, no possible injury resulted to petitioner by the testimony as to the record of the mortgage executed by the defendants, S. J. and Polk Miller, to Pollock Chevrolet Company. It therefore becomes unnecessary for this court to express an opinion upon the matter of concession of error as stated by the Court of Appeals, or to enter into a consideration thereof.

As to refused charge 8, it may be conceded that, strictly speaking, the charge was correct. Keyser v. Maas & Schwarz, 111 Ala. 390, 21…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keyser v. Maas & SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Collins Baking Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Harris v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. CurtinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Howse v. RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Donovan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Continental Development Corporation, Inc. v. VinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Martin's Administrators v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API