Legal Opinion
Geo. J. Meyer Manufacturing Co., a Wisconsin Corporation v. San Marino Electronic Corporation, a California Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1970No. 22592_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiff, appellee and cross-appellant, San Marino Electronic Corporation (San Marino) manufactures empty bottle inspection machines. Defendant, cross-complainant, appellant, cross-appellee, Geo. J. Meyer Manufacturing Co. (Meyer) manufactures a bottle inspection machine designated the Mark IV which is designed in part according to the teachings of U.S. Patent No. 3,133,640 (No. ’640). No. ’640 is the patent in suit.
To the extent important here the pleadings created issues as to the validity, infringement and misuse of Patent No. ’640. The district court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Aerotec Industries of Calif. v. Pacific Scientific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Florida Brace Corporation and Arthur R. Moore v. William L. Bartels and Prosthetic & Orthopedic Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Sperry Products, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
3Cited by14 opinions
- Toro Co. v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Weather Engineering Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Dickey-John Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. International Tapetronics Corporation and Field Electronics, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Revlon, Inc. v. Carson Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Kalkowski v. Ronco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.