Legal Opinion

State v. Tann

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1981No. 141PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant moved to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been denied. Denial of the motion constitutes his first assignment of error.

Defendant filed no affidavits or other evidentiary matter to support the conclusory assertions contained in his motion to dismiss. An examination of the record reveals the following chronology of events:

1. The crime was committed and defendant was arrested on 2 September 1979.

2. A probable cause hearing was set for 20 September 1979, but on that date defendant, through counsel, moved…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. MarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API