Morrow v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey •county, Willis, J., granting a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The plaintiff’s intestate, George Morrow, was on March 22, 1895, a conductor in the employ of the defendant, on one •of its electric car lines, known as the “Selby Avenue Extension,” which connected with its cable line at Milton street, in the city of St. Paul. While he was engaged, on the day named, in transferring bus car from one track to another on the electric line, a cable train -collided with the electric car, whereby he received injuries from which he died two days thereafter. This action was brought by his administratrix to recover damages for his death, on the ground that it was…
2Cited by17 opinions
- McAlpine v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Jemming v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.