Legal Opinion

Fishing Co. of Alaska, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2003No. 02-35312PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Fishing Company of Alaska, William McGill, and Richard Joseph appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the United States. The appellants challenge the regulations establishing the Vessel Incentive Program (“VIP”), a fishery management plan created by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (“The Council”) as part of its responsibility under the Magnuson Ste*1046vens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1883. See 16 U.S.C. § 1852. The appellants also challenge the fine imposed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Public Power Council v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. The Fishing Company of Alaska v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henderson v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Midwater Trawlers Co-Operative v. Department Of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Midwater Trawlers Co-Operative v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Fishing Company Of Alaska, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API