Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 2, 2006No. Nos. 04-35596, 04-36024PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Scroiacroce-Appellants appeal both the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Stmíacroce-Appellees, and its denial of their motion to reopen. We affirm. ETraer-Appellants appeal both the district court’s denial of their motion to reopen and its dismissal as moot of their declaratory judgment action. We affirm in part and reverse in part. Efroer-Appellants move to strike the State of Oregon’s affidavit not included in either district court record. We grant the motion to strike.
Factual Background and Procedural History1
In August 1974, female employee members of Oregon’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wicker v. Oregon Ex Rel. Bureau of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jamaul Monk v. Terri Gonzalez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Ebner v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008