Legal Opinion
Ford v. Mabus
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 10, 2010No. 09-5041PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, a federal government employee, alleges discrimination on the basis of age in violation of section 633a of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The district court applied the McDonnell Douglas framework and found that appellant had failed to meet his ultimate burden of proving that age was the but-for cause of the challenged action. Seeing error in neither the district court’s fact-findings nor its evidentiary rulings, we affirm that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- George Leal v. John McHughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Judith Barnett v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- James Reynolds v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- David DeJesus v. WP Company LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.