Legal Opinion
Deniz v. Municipality of Guaynabo
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 8, 2002No. 01-2020, 01-2021PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
These appeals grow out of an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In that action, plaintiff-appellant Calixto Déniz Márquez accuses the Municipality of Guaynabo (the Municipality) of confiscating his property without just compensation. The district court held that the plaintiffs takings claims were unripe and dismissed the action. Déniz Márquez v. Municipality of Guaynabo, 140 F.Supp.2d 135, 140 (D.P.R.2001). The plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
I
Background
Since the district court disposed of this matter on a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss, without taking evidence,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Valentin-De-Jesus v. United HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Katz v. Pershing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Redondo-Borges v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Estate of Bennett v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Garcia-Rubiera v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.