Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Thurston

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1966No. 8710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This matter came before us by a petition-for writ of prohibition or in the alternative-for a writ of certiorari by Dewey Jack. Hastings, Supervisor, Financial Responsibility Branch, Motor Vehicle Division,. Arizona State Highway Department, hereinafter referred to as petitioner. The petition sought to restrain or prohibit the respondent, Honorable Edwin Thurston,. Judge of the Superior Court of Maricopa County, from enforcing an order directing the petitioner to answer certain questions by counsel for the real parties in interest during a deposition and to further review the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schecter v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ehrhardt v. Ruan Transport Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Di Pietruntonio v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary and Chapel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Morrison v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. National Union Insurance v. ChattertonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API