Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Howard
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1987No. OSB 84-146, 85-22; SC S32207Published
1Opinion of the Court
743 P.2d 719 (1987)
304 Or. 193
In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Martin J. HOWARD, Accused.
OSB 84-146, 85-22; SC S32207.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Submitted on Record and Briefs July 8, 1987.
Decided October 6, 1987.
Martin J. Howard, Portland, pro se.
Mark J. Fucile and Gregory R. Mowe, Portland, for Oregon State Bar.
2Per curiam
The principal issue is whether the accused should be suspended or disbarred for violations of various disciplinary rules in the Code of Professional Responsibility. Two members of the trial panel of the disciplinary board decided that the accused be "permanently disbarred,"…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ReddawayOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Lobb's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.