Legal Opinion

Tabb v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 19, 2009No. Civil Action 06-0789 (PLF)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers, attached exhibits, and the entire record in the case, the Court will deny plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and will grant defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part and deny it in part. 1

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Shirley Tabb worked for the District of Columbia for almost 14 years, most recently as a Public Information Specialist for the District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency (“CFSA”). See PI.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Decotiis v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. Foley v. Town of RandolphCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. Rawlings v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Winder v. ErsteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Mentzer v. LanierDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API