Legal Opinion
Mary L. McKEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS TECHNICAL SERVICES COMPANY, INC., a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 26, 1983No. 81-2406PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that, because the panel opinion did not deal specifically with the consideration to be given on remand to the issuance of a right-to-sue letter, it is amended to substitute for the paragraph beginning “On remand the district judge,” 700 F.2d at 265-66, the following:
The record indicates that, at the time of the grant of summary judgment, 180 days had elapsed from the time McKee filed her EEOC charge 1 and she could by then have obtained a right-to-sue letter. We do not intimate that she may proceed…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Agnes E. NILSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Pinkard v. Pullman-StandardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Lexine PERDUE, Appellant, v. ROY STONE TRANSFER CORPORATION; Lonnie Hodges; Ben Koontz; AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Doris WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- Julian v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Eckerdt v. Frostex Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Thomas Schroeder v. Copley Newspaper, D/B/A Waukegan News-Sun, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Neal v. IAM Local Lodge 2386Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Hilliard v. ParishDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.