Legal Opinion

Hill v. Perrone

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 15, 2002No. 87,448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

Plaintiffs Michael G. Hill and Dianne M. Hill appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants William Perrone and Sylvia Perrone in a case involving a contract to purchase real estate. The trial court held the Perrones lawfully rescinded their agreement to buy the Hills’ home under a buyer satisfaction clause in the contract.

The material facts are as follows:

On July 12, 2000, the defendants entered into a written contract to purchase the plaintiffs’ residence. A clause in the contract provided that performance was contingent upon the completion of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. City of Topeka v. Watertower Place Development GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Hollingsworth v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Jenkins Towel Service v. Tidewater Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waste Connections of Kansas, Inc. v. Ritchie Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Ives v. McGannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  3. JDN Development Co., Inc. v. Terra Venture, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API