Legal Opinion

State v. Henneman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1936No. 4164PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

A. A. Henneman, Ruben Arellano, Ruben Mares, and Roy Overbay were charged with having, on the 15th day of June, 1933, in the county of Union in this state, unlawfully conspired to burn a grain elevator in Frederick, Okl. Mares and Over-bay entered pleas of guilty. On a plea of not guilty, Henneman and Arellano were found guilty by a jury, and from the judgment and sentence of from five to seven years in the penitentiary, entered September 8, 1934 Henneman prosecutes this appeal. On the recommendation of the jury Arellano was given a suspended sentence.

Appellant established…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Pettine v. Territory of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. People v. TallmadgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Powell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  5. Blass v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DeatonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. FuentesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. WhiteshieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. RobinsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API