Legal Opinion

Lane v. Cashman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 30, 2018No. AC38290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

The defendants, Jeffrey S. Cashman and Patricia Cashman, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Eric Knapp, the zoning enforcement officer for the town of Clinton. 1 The plaintiff brought the underlying action against the defendants to enforce orders to discontinue alleged zoning violations occurring at the defendants' property in Clinton. The defendants claim that the court erred in (1) striking their special defenses related to nonconforming uses and (2) granting the plaintiff's motions in limine. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In his…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Upjohn Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wahba v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. Jacques v. Commissioner of Energy & Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Wahba v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API