Manis v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. POTTER, District Judge:
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s supplemental memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment on Count 1 of plaintiff’s amended complaint, plaintiff's opposition and defendant’s reply. At a June 29, 1992 pretrial, the Court requested that the parties brief defendant’s affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction. Although the Court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Count I, it reserved judgment on the issue of accord and satisfaction.
This is an action to recover damages under the Federal Employers’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Forry, Inc. v. Neundorfer, Inc. And Michael NeundorferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Maynard v. Durham & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wicker v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Lanzy Wilson v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Sinclair v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Brophy v. Cincinnati, New Orleans, & Texas Pacific Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Fannin v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.