Legal Opinion
Arch Ins. Co. v. Centerplan Constr. Co., LLC
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 31, 2021No. 19-2622-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19-2622-cv Arch Ins. Co. v. Centerplan Constr. Co., LLC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- City of Providence v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.