Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. National Union Fire Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 18, 2001No. CIV. A. 96-2575(NHP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE ORIGINAL OF THIS AMENDED LETTER OPINION IS ON FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT
POLITAN, District Judge.
Dear Counsel:
This matter comes before the Court on a motion for summary judgment by Defendant, National Union Fire Insurance (“National Union” or “Defendant”). Oral argument was heard on March 16, 2001. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
STATEMENT OF FACTS 1
In 1984, a large-scale construction project called Port Liberte’ was launched on the Hudson River waterfront in Jersey City, New Jersey. The project contemplated use of 114 acres of land and the development of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Renasant Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017
- Shoemaker v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001