Legal Opinion
Brown v. Banking Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 23, 1978No. 48117, 48930, 49837 and 49838PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice.
These four actions pending before this Court have a common theme: each of three proposed banks (Wilshire, First Hefner, and Lakeshore National) seeks to be the only bank chartered in the same northwest Oklahoma City trade area.
Therefore, although the parties are not identical and the cases are before us on certiorari, as well as by prayer for extraordinary relief, we consolidate them for final determination of the related issues. Vose v. Banking Board, Okl., 483 P.2d 731 (1971). Consolidation is additionally necessary because this is the second occasion that the controversy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Adams v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Brown v. Banking BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Boen v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Dixon Brothers Lumber and Supply Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Smith v. Banking BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Bogle v. Banking BoardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Citizens Security Bank & Trust v. Banking Board of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Lakeshore Bank, N.A. v. Twin Lakes BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Southwestern Bank & Trust Co. v. Department of Banking & FinanceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.