Legal Opinion

Fellows v. Shultz

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1970No. 8804PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SISK, Justice.

Appellants protested an application filed by appellees with the State Engineer for a change of location of a water well, in accordance with the provisions of § 75-11-7, N.M.S.A.1953, as amended in 1967. The constitutionality of this statute is challenged by both appellants and the State Engineer. The trial court entered judgment for appellees on the merits of their application, but because the constitutional question is determinative it is not necessary to consider the additional points asserted on appeal.

We must first determine whether § 75-11-7, supra, is constitutional…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Alabam's Freight Co. v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Hovey Concrete Products Co. v. MechemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CousanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  2. Ex Parte Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Paluck v. BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS, STARK COUNTYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Woodahl v. District Court of the Second Judicial District ex rel. County of Silver BowMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Otero v. ZouharNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API