State v. Eubanks
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge
The State appeals the trial court’s grant of post-conviction relief vacating Anthony Eubanks’ convictions for murder and criminal confinement. The trial court determined it was “reversible error” for the State to call two co-conspirators to the witness stand knowing they would refuse to testify. Eubanks cross-appeals the finding of the trial court that failure to object to this evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel. Because we conclude that the witnesses’ invocation of the Fifth Amendment did not prejudice Eu-banks or result in an unfair trial, we reverse.
Facts…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bunch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Purifoy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Wendell Brown a/k/a Menes Ankh El v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.