United States v. Harold Tucker Matlock
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The defendant Harold Tucker Matlock was convicted on three counts of an indictment involving bank robbery. He claims three grounds of error in support of his request for reversal.
During the course of the trial, witnesses for the government were asked to wait in a designated room, a part of the Marshal’s offices, until they were called to testify. The defendant was detained in a cell adjacent to the Marshal’s office, and on two occasions was brought in handcuffs from that cell to the courtroom through the room in which the witnesses were waiting. This was a direct route to the courtroom but…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Workman v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- State v. LundgrenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Thomas Richard Warner, Michael Charles WardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Anthony Medina (91-1852) Nathaniel Wilson (91-1869) Neville King (91-1891/1892)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Jackson D. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.