Legal Opinion

Williams v. Rashid

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided November 19, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01676Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Angela Williams, et al., 2:21-cv-01676-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff(s), Order: 5 vs. [1] Granting in Part Motion to Proceed Anonymously; 6 Steve Sisolak, et al., [2] Granting Stipulation; and 7 Defendant(s). [3] Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Strike 8 Pending before the Court are the Motion to Proceed Pseudonymously (“Motion”) (ECF No. 215); 9 Amended Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (“Stipulation”) (ECF No. 216); and 10 defendants’ Motion to Strike Status Report (“Motion to Strike”) (ECF No. 226). The Court has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. John Doe v. Robert Ayers, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Robert ParishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API