Legal Opinion
John Doe v. Robert Ayers, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 2015No. 15-99006PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35: The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.
We publish this order for the purpose of explaining why we deny the state’s petition and why we reject its arguments objecting to our decision to grant Petitioner’s request in the alternative to issue our opinion using a pseudonym rather than Petitioner’s real name. 1
As a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Doe v. StegallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. John Doe, United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Doe v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Jane Doe v. Cenk SidarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Doe v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Publius v. Boyer-VineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- (PS) Parlante v. American River CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.