Legal Opinion

People v. Fuski

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1920No. Crim. No. 525PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime denounced by an act of the legislature passed in 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 10.) The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “The said Joe Fuski on the- day of November, A. D. 1919, at the County of Sacramento, in the State of California, and before the finding of this indictment, did then and there knowing one Esther Greely, a female person, to be a prostitute, did then and there willfully and unlawfully, feloniously and knowingly derive support and maintenance from the earnings and proceeds of the prostitution of said Esther Greely, she the said Esther…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. People v. KrompholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. People v. LawlorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. AtwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. PryorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. State v. GeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API