Legal Opinion

The New Zealand Insurance Company, Limited v. Louis Lenoff and Ella Lenoff

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1963No. 17821PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This case, involving an action by homeowners (appellees) against their insurer (appellant), under an all physical loss home policy, for damages to their home as a result of movement of its supporting-earth, was tried and decided by the District Court prior to the filing on January 17, 1963, of the opinion of the Supreme Court of California in Sabella v. Wisler, 27 Cal.Rptr. 689, 377 P.2d 889.

The insurance policy here in question contained, exactly, the same insuring clause, as well as the same exceptions, as-that construed in Sabella v. Wisler. 1

The District Court in rendering judgment in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wyatt v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co. of SeattleDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  3. West v. Umialik Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Standard Electric Supply Co. v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  5. Healy Tibbitts Construction Co. v. Foremost InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API