Legal Opinion
Brady v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The record in this appeal shows that the plaintiff’s decedent and the defendant had mutually agreed to be married at Christmas time, 1916. At the time of that agreement, the decedent was- the owner of a house and lot in Shelton, valued at $6,000, which was clear of all incumbrances except a mortgage for $1,000, and was occupied by a tenant. The defendant, soon after the agreement of marriage was made, persuaded the decedent to make his home at the house in Derby where she lived and rented rooms to lodgers. A short time later, she expressed a desire to live in the decedent’s house in Shelton,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wildman v. WildmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Ruocco v. LogioccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. VandemarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Supples v. CannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Sargent & Co. v. New Haven Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Legassey v. ShulanskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.