Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brooks v. Hartland Sportsman's Club, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 15, 1995No. 94-0768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Hartland Sportsman's Club, Inc. contends that its club operations are not subject to a conditional use permit issued in 1968 and later modified in 1992 by the Town of Delafield. The club argues that it has a vested interest in a legal nonconforming use which the Town could not alter and that, even if its use is not a legal nonconforming use, under the applicable statutory provisions in 1968, the Town's issuance of the conditional use permit was invalid. We hold that the club does not have a legal nonconforming use and, on the basis of invited error, the club has waived its invalidity argument…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Skelly Oil Co. v. Common CouncilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Jefferson County v. TimmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Zindell v. Central Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Waukesha County v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Great Lakes Trucking Co., Inc. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Bettendorf v. St. Croix County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API