Legal Opinion

Jefferson County v. Timmel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1952PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

On this appeal the defendant advances the following contentions:(1) That the zoning ordinance, as amended by the 1947 amendments, was invalid because of the alleged failure to comply with the following statutory procedural requirements :(a) No map was attached to the proposed ordinance or amendment.(b) The original ordinance and 1947 amendments were not published.(c) No written approval of the ordinance by the town board of the town of Farmington was filed with the county board.(d) No public hearing was held by the town board before voting approval of the ordinance.(2) That the town of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Tingley v. GurdaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Mehlos v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of ShelbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. WielandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Nodell Investment Corp. v. City of GlendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kmiec v. Town of Spider LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API