Legal Opinion

Fortier v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1996No. 95-83PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Jacqueline C. Fortier (Claimant) appeals the denial of her application for permanent total disability benefits. Finding the hearing officer’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and is otherwise in accordance with law, we affirm.

Claimant states two issues:

1. Did the hearing officer err as a matter of law by failing to consider the effect of [Claimant’s] 1990 back injury * * * in light of her pre-existing medical conditions in determining that those pre-existing conditions and not her 1990 back injury were the cause of her becoming permanently totally disabled?

2.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stuckey v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Associated Seed Growers, Inc. v. ScroghamWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Cordova v. Holly Sugar Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Salas v. General ChemicalWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hicks v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. FaulknerWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Walsh v. Holly Sugar Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. RoggenbuckWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API