Legal Opinion

Apelian v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1968No. Civ. 32186PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, J. pro tem. *

The plaintiff,Myrle L. Apellan, appeals from a formal order of dismissal after demurrers to her second amended complaint (hereinafter complaint) had been sustained without leave to amend. The defendants in the action are the County of Los Angeles (hereinafter County), 1 the City of Los Angeles (hereinafter City) and Edward L. Davenport, a deputy city attorney of the City.

The complaint contains a single count which alleges that all of the defendants, and additional fictitiously named entities, were guilty of negligence and wilful misconduct which proximately resulted in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. BriteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Griffith v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Southall v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Friendly Village Community Ass'n v. Silva & Hill Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Sackett v. WyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Bradford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Zappas v. King Williams Press, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API