Legal Opinion
Zappas v. King Williams Press, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 1970No. Civ. 34803PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Plaintiff has appealed from an order dismissing his action, entered after the court sustained defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint without leave to amend.
The third amended complaint alleges the following facts: In January of 1966 plaintiff orally agreed (1) to find and introduce defendants to a person or persons who would lease defendants’ real property in Torrance, California; and (2) to introduce defendants to a contractor and designer with whom plaintiff—on his own behalf—had negotiated a tentative agreement for the construction of a building on the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pierce v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Fundin v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Preach v. Monter RainbowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.