Legal Opinion
George v. Security Trust & Savings Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1928No. Docket No. 5016PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, J., pro tem.
A demurrer to the original complaint was sustained and plaintiff filed an amended complaint. To this pleading a demurrer was likewise interposed. It was sustained by the court without leave to amend, and judgment went for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
There is no contention that plaintiff desired further to amend, and the briefs respond to the one question only: Does the complaint state a cause of action? This is the sole question to be considered here.
The facts as alleged in the complaint are concisely put in appellant’s opening brief as follows: “The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graves v. . the American Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Knoxville Water Co. v. East Tennessee National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Farmer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- United States Portland Cement Co. v. United States National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Indiana National Bank v. HoltsclawIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- MacKey-woodard, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Lindsley v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Walsh v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Jones v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.