United States Portland Cement Co. v. United States National Bank
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court. Hon. William D. Wright, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill
A demurrer was sustained, to the plaintiff’s amended complaint. It declined to amend. For a first cause of action, among other things, it alleges, that The Kirchhof Lumber Company was indebted to plaintiff for cement, etc.; that on February 7, 1914, the lumber company executed its check on The Denver National Bank, payable to the order of the plaintiff, for $267 in payment of said indebtedness, and thereafter delivered and entrusted said check to one H. C. Snyder as an employe of the plaintiff; that Snyder was its employ in the capacity of sales manager, with no authority to make, sign or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Graves v. . the American Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Knoxville Water Co. v. East Tennessee National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Farmer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Boettcher v. Colorado Nat. BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- MacKey-woodard, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Lindsley v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Citizens State Bank v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.