Legal Opinion

United Technologies v. South Carolina Second Injury Fund

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1995No. 24227PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal Justice:

Pacific Employers Insurance Company appeals the order of the Circuit Court affirming the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s ruling that its claim for reimbursement from the Second injury Fund is barred under S.C. Code Ann. § 42-9-400(f) (1985). We affirm.

FACTS

This action arose out of a claim by Pacific Employers Insurance Company. (“Pacific”) for reimbursement against the South Carolina Second Injury Fund for benefits paid on behalf of Michael Kelly, an employee of Pacific’s insured United Technologies.

*215United hired Kelly in Columbia, South Carolina to perform work in Michigan. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Bauer v. South Carolina State Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. American Yard ProductsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Pressley v. Lancaster CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API