Legal Opinion

Monzingo v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1929No. 18870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

E. R. Monzingo, as plaintiff, brought this action against Edna Bowers, as defendant, to recover the sum of $300, alleged to be due plaintiff as a real estate broker’s commission. Defendant denied generally the allegations of - the plaintiff’s petition. A trial was had to the court without a jury, and at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the court sustained defendant’s demurrer thereto, and dismissed the cause.

Plaintiff has appealed, and presents only one objection to the judgment of the court, that is, that the court erred in sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yoder v. Randol NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Gorman v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Montgomery v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Corbin v. Mechanics & Traders' BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Sturgeon v. CulverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wewoka Petroleum Corporation v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Scott v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Stewart v. LesinUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Eastern Oklahoma Land & Cattle Co. v. DorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. H. B. Davidson v. R. M. Vandegrift, F. B. Meyer and Gibraltar Oil Company, a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API