Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 10, 1953No. 57385; protest 185676-K/3780 (Chicago)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to pieces of vellum of various sizes which were classified as parts of percussion instruments under paragraph 1541 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51909, and accordingly assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is free of duty under the eo nomine provision for “vellum” in paragraph 1736 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

The sole witness herein was the purchasing agent of the importing company, C. G. Conn,. Ltd., of Elkhart, Ind., whose business is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Acrow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API