Legal Opinion
Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 26, 1934No. 29,530PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 252 N.W. 434, 253 N.W. 888. The one issue is between two carriers of public liability insurance. It is whether they should share equally the loss hereinafter considered. The decision below went for the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company and against the Hartford Accident Indemnity Company. They will be referred to for convenience as the Commercial and the Hartford. The case was submitted below upon agreed statement of facts. The Hartford appeals from the judgment.
November 3, 1926, the Commercial issued its policy to one Strom insuring him against liability for personal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Clarno v. Gamble-Robinson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
3Cited by42 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- American Automobile Insurance v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.