Legal Opinion

Birnhak v. Vaccaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1975PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff vendees appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 24, 1974, which (1) denied their motion for summary judgment and (2) granted defendant’s cross application for summary judgment. Order modified by deleting therefrom the second decretal paragraph thereof and inserting in its stead a provision denying defendant’s cross application. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs instituted this action to compel defendant to perform an alleged agreement to sell to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Tobias v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Tobias v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Lukawski v. DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rose v. Spa Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Read v. HenzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Ramos v. Lido Home Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. 160 Chambers St. Realty Corp. v. Register of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Jill Real Estate, Inc. v. SmylesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API