Tobias v. . Lynch
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 28, 1920, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the Kings County Court at a Trial Term without a jury. The action was to compel specific performance of an alleged contract to sell real property.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 28, 1920, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the Kings County Court at a Trial Term without a jury. The action was to compel specific performance of an alleged contract to sell real property. The following memorandum of sale was attacked as insufficient under the Statute of Frauds because it failed to distinguish between the purchaser and seller and because the date for closing was omitted: „ May ^ lgm “ Agreement…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: McLaughlin, J.
2Cited by20 opinions
- Birnhak v. VaccaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Allied Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Kerby Saunders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Villano v. G & C Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Gregg v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Sid Farber Hempstead Corp. v. BuckleySuffolk County District Court · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.